<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Syria: UN Monitors a Failure?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://politicalviolenceataglance.org/2012/06/20/syria-un-monitors-a-failure/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://politicalviolenceataglance.org/2012/06/20/syria-un-monitors-a-failure/</link>
	<description>Expert Analysis on Violence and Its Alternatives</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 19:07:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: adanesuazo</title>
		<link>http://politicalviolenceataglance.org/2012/06/20/syria-un-monitors-a-failure/comment-page-1/#comment-54</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[adanesuazo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2012 12:33:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalviolenceataglance.org/?p=107#comment-54</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Very interesting argument.  I agree with you in that too much hope has been placed on the UN monitoring mission in Syria.  I also find your argument of the participation of moderate countries compelling.  I recently wrote a post (which you can find in this link http://adanesuazo.wordpress.com/) where I envisioned a scenario where Iran played an active role in the peace process as a mediator, mainly in an attempt to thwart Russian and Chinese vetoes at the Security Council.  I dare to say that Iran is far from being a moderate country, but could we argue that, given its position in this conflict, that it could potentially play an important role in opening the door for a mandate under chapter 7 of the UN Charter?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting argument.  I agree with you in that too much hope has been placed on the UN monitoring mission in Syria.  I also find your argument of the participation of moderate countries compelling.  I recently wrote a post (which you can find in this link <a href="http://adanesuazo.wordpress.com/" rel="nofollow">http://adanesuazo.wordpress.com/</a>) where I envisioned a scenario where Iran played an active role in the peace process as a mediator, mainly in an attempt to thwart Russian and Chinese vetoes at the Security Council.  I dare to say that Iran is far from being a moderate country, but could we argue that, given its position in this conflict, that it could potentially play an important role in opening the door for a mandate under chapter 7 of the UN Charter?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
