One thing that academics do is engage in “verstehens” or thought experiments. This said, we do not always push things to extremes, preferring to deal with what James Fearon (1991) refers to as “plausible counterfactuals”. Sometimes this hinders us, however, as it does not allow us to explore the seemingly obvious contradictions that exist around us. Those in popular culture who put out cartoons, graphic novels, and comics are not constrained in this manner, but delight in such spaces. Accordingly, it is useful to take in this perspective every now and then in order to better see where we are — perhaps listening closest to the “fool” in a Shakespearean piece, normally the wisest of us all.
You May Also Like
Questions on Torture with Joe Young
- August 10, 2020
In this interview, Joe Young talks about his new book, Tortured Logic: Why Some Americans Support the Use…
The Three “Rs”: Rigor, Relevance, and Responsibility in Policy-Engaged Research
- May 21, 2019
By the Sié Center at the Josef Korbel School of International Studies, University of Denver. In recent years, there…
Do Interventions End Repressive Spells? Insights for Syria from Previous Attempts, 1976-2003
- September 11, 2013
By Christian Davenport and Ben Appel It is said that those who ignore history are doomed repeat prior mistakes.…
An Attack on Syria Isn’t About Chemical Weapons
- August 29, 2013
Guest post by Brent Sasley It is increasingly likely that the United States, along with a coalition of…
The Blame Game
- July 21, 2014
By Andrew Kydd The downing of a Malaysian airliner over eastern Ukraine with the loss of almost 300…
Bridging the Metonymic Gap: In Practice Rather Than in Parlance
- October 13, 2015
By Cassy Dorff for Denver Dialogues The conversation on “bridging the gap” is a well-aged one to say…
2 comments
This is a good one, too:
Dear Assad… https://medium.com/war-is-boring/25d943fe5380
I enjoyed the work Matt Bors did for David Axe’s comic memoir.