I’m deep in grading papers, but wanted to bring your attention to a potentially nasty situation that isn’t getting much press in the US.
You May Also Like
Sleeper Agents or Big Yawn? Waiting for Returned Foreign Fighters
- January 18, 2016
Guest post by David Malet. Western governments, increasingly alarmed by ISIS-inspired attacks in the West and fearing the…
More Education = Less Terrorism? Studying the Complex Relationship Between Terrorism and Education
- December 4, 2015
Guest post by Sarah Brockhoff, Tim Krieger & Daniel Meierrieks. In the aftermath of terrorist attacks, education is often…
How Did Guerrilla Violence Shape the 2014 Presidential Election in Colombia?
- March 25, 2015
Guest post by Michael Weintraub, Thomas Flores, and Juan Vargas Violence sadly has become a regular feature of…
Democracy and Coups: Taking Civilian Control of the Military for Granted
- August 28, 2012
By Steve Saideman This post is part of the “Would Someone Please Explain This to Me?” series. Reader Luis asks:…
Gendered Violence and Political Agendas
- February 11, 2019
Guest post by Hilary Matfess, Robert U. Nagel, and Meredith Loken. On January 25th, President Donald Trump announced…
The Mueller Report and Global Contentious Politics
- March 26, 2019
By Deborah Avant for Denver Dialogues. As we begin to digest Attorney General William Barr’s summary of the…
6 comments
Venezuela isn’t in great shape, to put it mildly, and the current government is dragging it down the toilet. But Roger Noriega is not to be trusted at all here. You owe it to your readers to cite more reliable sources, like Caracas Chronicles if you want an opposition voice.
I’m afraid that I’m forced to agree with Beef on this. Besides his own backstory, he’s comparing the situation to Syria (no), suggesting that it might turn into a prolonged civil war (possible but unlikely), is deliberately ignoring that Maduro actually did manage to win 44% even if he did use illegal methods and is suggesting Iran and Hezhbollah might get involved in the nation (good God no).
No one’s pretending things are good in Venezuela. No one’s pretending that Maduro is even less capable of ruling than Chavez was (for all his lack of economic sanity he at least knew how to control his party). But Noriega is not someone I would call credible.
And that’s not even considering that this was published in the New York Post. When I think of journalism and influential reporting, the name that does not come to mind is the New York Post.
I also doubt the source. Venezuela is an enemy of the American right, and Murdoch / News Corp. publications such as the NY Post (and Fox and the Wall St Journal) have frequently proven willing to publish propaganda about political enemies. I’d like to see a source, from anywhere on the political spectrum, with more of a reputation for intellectual honesty.
You know you’re in deep shit when you run out of toilet paper… Hope it resolves peacefully.
Agreed, but the economic status on its own is not enough for civil war and I don’t think the conditions are right for one. Political violence, yes. A coup? Possibly. But civil war? I realize I might be setting myself up to look bad (Dan Drezner has pointed out that people who were optimistic and wrong are often more criticized than people who were pessimistic and wrong) but I do not believe that the conditions in Venezuela are right for a civil war.
The New York Post is right-wing propaganda. It is somewhat unsettling to see it used as a source for any sort of serious observation, unless we’re practicing a sort of latter-day Kremlinology, guessing from obscure clues what adventures U.S. leaders may embark upon next. It is probably not worth the effort.