I’m deep in grading papers, but wanted to bring your attention to a potentially nasty situation that isn’t getting much press in the US.
You May Also Like
Why is Freedom in Decline?
- November 22, 2013
By Erica Chenoweth Every year Freedom House publishes a report on the state of Freedom in the World.[1]…
How to Get Research to Impact Policy
- May 24, 2018
By Cyanne E. Loyle, Kathleen Cunningham, and Joe Young. As insular academics, we often grumble that if only people…
War Isn’t (Quite) the Right Metaphor for COVID-19
- May 20, 2020
Guest post by Sara Plana and Sanne Verschuren The analogy of the COVID-19 crisis as war is inescapable.…
When Norms Collide: Business, Human Rights, and Economic Development in Colombia
- May 28, 2019
By Laura Bernal-Bermúdez and Tricia D. Olsen for Denver Dialogues. *Note: a Spanish-language version of this post is below…
Interview: A Local Peacebuilder’s Take on the FARC Peace Talks
- August 18, 2015
By Oliver Kaplan for Denver Dialogues (Please note: A Spanish version of this post is available at Las…
New Presidency, New Policy: How Researchers Can Impact Policy
- November 10, 2020
Vice President Joseph Biden has won the 2020 US Presidential Election against incumbent President Donald Trump. Biden said…
6 comments
Venezuela isn’t in great shape, to put it mildly, and the current government is dragging it down the toilet. But Roger Noriega is not to be trusted at all here. You owe it to your readers to cite more reliable sources, like Caracas Chronicles if you want an opposition voice.
I’m afraid that I’m forced to agree with Beef on this. Besides his own backstory, he’s comparing the situation to Syria (no), suggesting that it might turn into a prolonged civil war (possible but unlikely), is deliberately ignoring that Maduro actually did manage to win 44% even if he did use illegal methods and is suggesting Iran and Hezhbollah might get involved in the nation (good God no).
No one’s pretending things are good in Venezuela. No one’s pretending that Maduro is even less capable of ruling than Chavez was (for all his lack of economic sanity he at least knew how to control his party). But Noriega is not someone I would call credible.
And that’s not even considering that this was published in the New York Post. When I think of journalism and influential reporting, the name that does not come to mind is the New York Post.
I also doubt the source. Venezuela is an enemy of the American right, and Murdoch / News Corp. publications such as the NY Post (and Fox and the Wall St Journal) have frequently proven willing to publish propaganda about political enemies. I’d like to see a source, from anywhere on the political spectrum, with more of a reputation for intellectual honesty.
You know you’re in deep shit when you run out of toilet paper… Hope it resolves peacefully.
Agreed, but the economic status on its own is not enough for civil war and I don’t think the conditions are right for one. Political violence, yes. A coup? Possibly. But civil war? I realize I might be setting myself up to look bad (Dan Drezner has pointed out that people who were optimistic and wrong are often more criticized than people who were pessimistic and wrong) but I do not believe that the conditions in Venezuela are right for a civil war.
The New York Post is right-wing propaganda. It is somewhat unsettling to see it used as a source for any sort of serious observation, unless we’re practicing a sort of latter-day Kremlinology, guessing from obscure clues what adventures U.S. leaders may embark upon next. It is probably not worth the effort.