I’m deep in grading papers, but wanted to bring your attention to a potentially nasty situation that isn’t getting much press in the US.
You May Also Like
Migration, Cities, and Engaged Scholarship
- May 1, 2018
By Kelsey P. Norman for Denver Dialogues. On April 3, 2018, just prior to the start of the…
The Most Surprising Thing About the Venezuela Drone Attack is that it Hasn’t Happened Sooner
- September 4, 2018
By Julia Macdonald for Denver Dialogues. Approximately one month ago a group of dissident soldiers reportedly attempted to…
Sudan One Year After the Coup
- April 29, 2020
By guest contributor Salah Ben Hammou On April 11, 2019, the Sudanese military ousted President Omar Al-Bashir in…
Americans Knew About Russia’s Election Meddling – Here’s What That Might Mean for Future US Elections
- July 27, 2017
By Sarah Bush and Lauren Prather. An ongoing FBI investigation is currently trying to determine the nature and extent of…
Reactions to Terrorism Can Bring Serious Harm
- May 2, 2019
By Renard Sexton, Rachel Wellhausen, and Mike Findley. A series of deadly attacks took place in Sri Lanka…
Democracy Is the Antidote to State Repression
- December 12, 2022
Lindsay Morgan interviews Christian Davenport and Ben Appel In the latest Talking Policy episode, Christian Davenport, one of…
6 comments
Venezuela isn’t in great shape, to put it mildly, and the current government is dragging it down the toilet. But Roger Noriega is not to be trusted at all here. You owe it to your readers to cite more reliable sources, like Caracas Chronicles if you want an opposition voice.
I’m afraid that I’m forced to agree with Beef on this. Besides his own backstory, he’s comparing the situation to Syria (no), suggesting that it might turn into a prolonged civil war (possible but unlikely), is deliberately ignoring that Maduro actually did manage to win 44% even if he did use illegal methods and is suggesting Iran and Hezhbollah might get involved in the nation (good God no).
No one’s pretending things are good in Venezuela. No one’s pretending that Maduro is even less capable of ruling than Chavez was (for all his lack of economic sanity he at least knew how to control his party). But Noriega is not someone I would call credible.
And that’s not even considering that this was published in the New York Post. When I think of journalism and influential reporting, the name that does not come to mind is the New York Post.
I also doubt the source. Venezuela is an enemy of the American right, and Murdoch / News Corp. publications such as the NY Post (and Fox and the Wall St Journal) have frequently proven willing to publish propaganda about political enemies. I’d like to see a source, from anywhere on the political spectrum, with more of a reputation for intellectual honesty.
You know you’re in deep shit when you run out of toilet paper… Hope it resolves peacefully.
Agreed, but the economic status on its own is not enough for civil war and I don’t think the conditions are right for one. Political violence, yes. A coup? Possibly. But civil war? I realize I might be setting myself up to look bad (Dan Drezner has pointed out that people who were optimistic and wrong are often more criticized than people who were pessimistic and wrong) but I do not believe that the conditions in Venezuela are right for a civil war.
The New York Post is right-wing propaganda. It is somewhat unsettling to see it used as a source for any sort of serious observation, unless we’re practicing a sort of latter-day Kremlinology, guessing from obscure clues what adventures U.S. leaders may embark upon next. It is probably not worth the effort.