Would Someone Please Explain This to Me?

By Taylor Marvin

Last summer we asked our readers to submit their questions about political violence for our contributors to take a crack at. We’d now like to do the same, again. Got a question about political violence and conflict? Submit your questions in the comments, and our team of contributors will try and answer. We will post the answer to the first question we’ve chosen next week.

0 comments
  1. 1. What reforms should policy makers enact according to the peace and conflict literature you think is the most convincing in order to save greatest number of innocents’ lives?

    2.What peace and conflict research do you think is the most groundbreaking of the last decade, and why?

  2. How true is the assertion that drones actually have lower civilian death rates than more traditional methods? Is it even fair to make the comparison because it is so much easier for drones to hit targets than ground forces?

  3. Why does war not break out in cases in which, according to existing theories of civil war onset, violence technically should break out? In other words: why is there peace when we would expect war? (Other than GDP/per capita)

  4. Does the level of ethnic fragmentation within a country affect the level of violence when conflict breaks out? Using the Arab Spring revolutions as case studies, can this possible association explain the varying degrees of conflict (from nonvoilent in some countries to very violent in others) witnessed throughout the Middle East and North Africa?

    Along similar lines, does a minority group in a position of power predict higher levels of violence in suppressing popular anti-government revolutions? Was Syria’s initially nonviolent revolution thus doomed from the start? In such cases, I would think that high-level defections of important pillars of support for the ruling coalition (business elites, military officials, etc.) would be fewer and farther between, due to enhanced fear of reprisals from other ethnic groups not in power. Violent repression would thus persist and even increase on behalf of the government as it desperately hangs on to power, and the opposition would never truly benefit from military defections that could swing the chances of successful revolution in their favor.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like
Read More

Weekly Links

By Taylor Marvin A video imagining a future where Russian freedom fighters battle a fascist, expansionary, and — ludicrously…
Read More
Read More

Weekly Links

By Patrick Pierson. US infrastructure is woefully ill-equipped to deal with cyber threats. George W. Bush is not…
Read More
Read More

Weekly Links

By Patrick Pierson.   Over the 4th of July weekend, more than 100 hundred people suffered gunshot wounds in…
Read More
Read More

Weekly Links

By Patrick Pierson. Last weekend, a Saudi airstrike directed at a funeral hall in Yemen killed over 140…
Read More
Read More

Weekly Links

By Sarah Bakhtiari To what degree are the Russian economy’s woes a consequence of international factors? Andrey Movchan…
Read More

Weekly Links

By Danny Hirschel-Burns In a wide-ranging essay in the London Review of Books, Owen Bennett looks out at ISIS’…
Read More