Last week we asked why Kenya’s recent general election was peaceful, in contrast to the post-election violence that followed the country’s divisive December 2007 vote. At first glance this peaceful nature is puzzling: the election was close, like in 2007, and observers were concerned that violence would once again ensue. So why did little violence occur? Commenter hearabout suggests that in the years following the traumatic 2007-8 unrest Kenyans have worked to prevent tribal and political violence, and election media coverage has been comparatively milder. “Further,” hearabout writes, “the main actors of the 2008 violence, Kenyatta and Ruto and such, have also demonstrated restraint and called for peace.”
You May Also Like
The Underpinnings of Rebel Governance in the Eastern DRC
- April 26, 2016
By Carla Suarez for Denver Dialogues Growing evidence demonstrates that the organizational norms and structures of rebel groups…
The Global Impacts of COVID-19
- July 13, 2020
How has the COVID-19 pandemic affected prospects for peace or conflict; political participation; and civil liberties around the…
“Hugs, not gunshots”: How can AMLO convince Mexicans of a new approach to security?
- October 18, 2018
Guest post by Juan Masullo and Davide Morisi. The same night Mexico’s President-elect, Andrés Manuel López Obrador (aka…
When Zuma #Falls: Stress-Testing Democracy in South Africa
- August 1, 2017
By Timothy D. Sisk for Denver Dialogues. South Africa is witnessing an escalating crisis as the succession of…
Getting the Youth Bulge Wrong
- February 15, 2018
By Aaron Stanley Africa’s population is growing and quickly. Even those who are generally unaware of happenings on…
Amnesty, the ICC and Complications with the Dominic Ongwen Case
- March 23, 2015
Guest post by Cyanne E. Loyle Lord’s Resistance Army (LRA) commander, Dominic Ongwen, surrendered to U.S. forces in…