Last week we asked why Kenya’s recent general election was peaceful, in contrast to the post-election violence that followed the country’s divisive December 2007 vote. At first glance this peaceful nature is puzzling: the election was close, like in 2007, and observers were concerned that violence would once again ensue. So why did little violence occur? Commenter hearabout suggests that in the years following the traumatic 2007-8 unrest Kenyans have worked to prevent tribal and political violence, and election media coverage has been comparatively milder. “Further,” hearabout writes, “the main actors of the 2008 violence, Kenyatta and Ruto and such, have also demonstrated restraint and called for peace.”
You May Also Like
WANTED: UN Peacekeepers for Mali
- June 20, 2016
By Marina Henke. In early June UN Secretary General Ban Ki-Moon made an urgent plea to increase the…
Ethnicity and Collective Targeting in Civil Wars
- April 13, 2015
Guest post by Lisa Hultman and Hanne Fjelde A few days ago UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon called on…
Authoritarian Tactics on US Soil
- August 5, 2020
By Danielle Lupton, David T. Burbach, and Lindsay P. Cohn Over the past two weeks, Department of Homeland…
Elections and Coup Risk in Zimbabwe One Year after the Coup d’État
- November 7, 2018
Guest post by Jonathan Powell and Clayton Besaw. The removal of Robert Mugabe from Zimbabwe’s presidency in November…
Burundi and the Challenges of Evaluating Peace-building Success
- May 22, 2015
Guest post by David E. Cunningham Recent events in Burundi, where President Pierre Nkurunziza’s decision to seek a…
Can the Rise of Far-Right Parties Spark Extremist Violence?
- November 22, 2022
Guest post by Erika Ricci On September 25, Italy witnessed the victory of Giorgia Meloni’s Fratelli d’Italia party,…