Last week we asked why Kenya’s recent general election was peaceful, in contrast to the post-election violence that followed the country’s divisive December 2007 vote. At first glance this peaceful nature is puzzling: the election was close, like in 2007, and observers were concerned that violence would once again ensue. So why did little violence occur? Commenter hearabout suggests that in the years following the traumatic 2007-8 unrest Kenyans have worked to prevent tribal and political violence, and election media coverage has been comparatively milder. “Further,” hearabout writes, “the main actors of the 2008 violence, Kenyatta and Ruto and such, have also demonstrated restraint and called for peace.”
You May Also Like
Resisting Political Violence in America
- October 8, 2020
Guest post by Jessica Maves Braithwaite Concern is growing about the potential for escalating and widespread violence in…
Democracy in Peril: Ten Elections to Watch in 2018
- January 11, 2018
By Timothy D. Sisk for Denver Dialogues Democracy’s resilience into the 21st century is rightly questioned. In 2017,…
The Threat in America is Destroying Democracy from Within
- September 28, 2020
By Stephen M. Saideman Because of Donald Trump’s statements, and news that his campaign staff has been seeking…
DRC’s Nyiragongo Erupts: Does This Mean Conflict Will Too?
- June 14, 2021
Guest post by Jaclyn Johnson and Christopher Faulkner The Nyiragongo volcano in the North Kivu region of the…
Do No Harm: US Aid to Africa and Civilian Security
- May 8, 2023
Guest post by Patricia L. Sullivan During her recent trip to Africa, US Vice President Kamala Harris announced…
Civil Society to the Rescue?
- September 10, 2020
By Evan Perkoski and Erica Chenoweth Widespread pro-democracy protests have engulfed Belarus over claims that the recent presidential…