Last week we asked why Kenya’s recent general election was peaceful, in contrast to the post-election violence that followed the country’s divisive December 2007 vote. At first glance this peaceful nature is puzzling: the election was close, like in 2007, and observers were concerned that violence would once again ensue. So why did little violence occur? Commenter hearabout suggests that in the years following the traumatic 2007-8 unrest Kenyans have worked to prevent tribal and political violence, and election media coverage has been comparatively milder. “Further,” hearabout writes, “the main actors of the 2008 violence, Kenyatta and Ruto and such, have also demonstrated restraint and called for peace.”
You May Also Like
Friday Puzzler: The Mystery of the Un-Recovered Nigerian Girls
- January 2, 2015
By Barbara F. Walter Today’s puzzler is short and sweet: How is it possible that no government, including…
When Are Coups Fake News?
- June 16, 2020
By guest contributor John Chin Despite the havoc that the coronavirus pandemic continues to wreak around the world,…
Does UN Peacekeeping Work? A New Perspective
- September 26, 2022
Guest post by William G. Nomikos In a recent New York Times op-ed entitled “I Love the U.N.,…
When Civilian Protests Facilitate Coups d’Etat: Reflecting on Revolution and Counter-Revolution in Sudan
- April 14, 2022
Guest post by Salah Ben Hammou Monday marked three years since Sudanese officers toppled longtime dictator Omar al-Bashir…
Elections and Coup Risk in Zimbabwe One Year after the Coup d’État
- November 7, 2018
Guest post by Jonathan Powell and Clayton Besaw. The removal of Robert Mugabe from Zimbabwe’s presidency in November…
What to do When Women Politicians are Attacked? Here are Four Ideas from Around the World
- May 14, 2019
By Juliana Restrepo Sanín for Denver Dialogues. In a previous post, I discussed how women elected to public…