Last week we asked why Kenya’s recent general election was peaceful, in contrast to the post-election violence that followed the country’s divisive December 2007 vote. At first glance this peaceful nature is puzzling: the election was close, like in 2007, and observers were concerned that violence would once again ensue. So why did little violence occur? Commenter hearabout suggests that in the years following the traumatic 2007-8 unrest Kenyans have worked to prevent tribal and political violence, and election media coverage has been comparatively milder. “Further,” hearabout writes, “the main actors of the 2008 violence, Kenyatta and Ruto and such, have also demonstrated restraint and called for peace.”
You May Also Like
Why has Sudan’s Tolerance for Anti-Regime Protests Run Dry?
- June 18, 2019
By Dawn Brancati. In early June, Sudanese paramilitary forces fired live ammunition into an unarmed crowd of protesters…
DRC’s Nyiragongo Erupts: Does This Mean Conflict Will Too?
- June 14, 2021
Guest post by Jaclyn Johnson and Christopher Faulkner The Nyiragongo volcano in the North Kivu region of the…
Authoritarian Resilience: Why Bouteflika and Bashir Fell, but Ortega Remains
- April 30, 2019
By Kai Thaler for Denver Dialogues. April saw protestors—with an assist from the military—oust longtime authoritarian leaders Abdelaziz…
The Strategic Incentives for Violent Extremism
- February 3, 2015
By Barbara F. Walter On February 18th, the Obama administration will hold a Summit on Countering Violent Extremism.…
When Zuma #Falls: Stress-Testing Democracy in South Africa
- August 1, 2017
By Timothy D. Sisk for Denver Dialogues. South Africa is witnessing an escalating crisis as the succession of…
Why the Military Promised to Withdraw from Power in Sudan
- January 10, 2023
Guest post by Hager Ali Little more than a year ago, the military side of the coalition charged…