Last week we asked why Kenya’s recent general election was peaceful, in contrast to the post-election violence that followed the country’s divisive December 2007 vote. At first glance this peaceful nature is puzzling: the election was close, like in 2007, and observers were concerned that violence would once again ensue. So why did little violence occur? Commenter hearabout suggests that in the years following the traumatic 2007-8 unrest Kenyans have worked to prevent tribal and political violence, and election media coverage has been comparatively milder. “Further,” hearabout writes, “the main actors of the 2008 violence, Kenyatta and Ruto and such, have also demonstrated restraint and called for peace.”
You May Also Like
What Electoral Reform Means for Iraq
- January 14, 2020
Guest post by Ariel I. Ahram The dramatic escalation of US-Iranian tensions affects no country more than Iraq.…
Is Zimbabwe Headed Towards Civil War?
- September 19, 2016
Guest post by Aaron Stanley. A number of recent reports out of Zimbabwe note a fracturing of Zimbabwe’s…
Why Jihadists Are Collecting “Zakat” in the Sahel
- July 12, 2021
Guest post by Alex Thurston Around the world, jihadists use a dizzying array of mechanisms to finance themselves,…
Strongman Benefits from Terrorism and Security Concerns in Sri Lanka
- November 20, 2019
By Page Fortna Sri Lankans went to the polls on Friday, 10+ years after a long-running civil war,…
The Future of Conflict in Mining
- October 27, 2020
Guest post by Anouk Rigterink and Kristen DeCaires Gall On June 17, 2019, the Democratic Republic of Congo’s…
Political Violence @ A Glance Welcomes Christian Davenport
- March 1, 2020
Christian Davenport joins the editorial board of Political Violence @ A Glance at a time of global upheaval,…