Last week we asked why Kenya’s recent general election was peaceful, in contrast to the post-election violence that followed the country’s divisive December 2007 vote. At first glance this peaceful nature is puzzling: the election was close, like in 2007, and observers were concerned that violence would once again ensue. So why did little violence occur? Commenter hearabout suggests that in the years following the traumatic 2007-8 unrest Kenyans have worked to prevent tribal and political violence, and election media coverage has been comparatively milder. “Further,” hearabout writes, “the main actors of the 2008 violence, Kenyatta and Ruto and such, have also demonstrated restraint and called for peace.”
You May Also Like
Lessons from the Cambridge Analytica Files: Don’t Be Evil
- March 20, 2018
By Zoe Marks and Erica Chenoweth for Denver Dialogues. Over the weekend, The Guardian broke a series of stories…
Looking Back on 2014
- December 30, 2014
By Danny Hirschel-Burns It’s been another great year for Political Violence @ a Glance. We won the International…
That’s Not Really A Thing Anymore: Why Calls for Secession Come and Go
- February 7, 2023
Guest post by Kevin Gatter On the night of October 30, 1995, Canadians held their collective breath as…
Internationally Irrelevant: The Limited Reach of Scotland’s Precedent Setting
- November 18, 2013
By Stephen Saideman There have long been fears that a successful secessionist effort will encourage other potential secessionists, potentially…
Why It Matters if Trump Rejects the Election Result
- November 11, 2020
Guest post by Philip A. Martin As of this writing, President Donald Trump appears determined to deny that…
Understanding the “Alternative for Germany”: Origins, Aims, and Consequences
- November 22, 2016
By Rachel Epstein and Donald Abenheim for Denver Dialogues. The election of Donald J. Trump to the presidency…