Last week we asked why Kenya’s recent general election was peaceful, in contrast to the post-election violence that followed the country’s divisive December 2007 vote. At first glance this peaceful nature is puzzling: the election was close, like in 2007, and observers were concerned that violence would once again ensue. So why did little violence occur? Commenter hearabout suggests that in the years following the traumatic 2007-8 unrest Kenyans have worked to prevent tribal and political violence, and election media coverage has been comparatively milder. “Further,” hearabout writes, “the main actors of the 2008 violence, Kenyatta and Ruto and such, have also demonstrated restraint and called for peace.”
You May Also Like
Comparative Xenophobia, Part II
- May 22, 2013
By Steve Saideman I had intended to address the relationship between economic freedom and tolerance Max Fisher touched…
The Case of the Missing Dictators
- November 2, 2018
By Barbara F. Walter. Two weeks ago I asked why so many African dictators resigned in the short…
Russia’s Growing Influence in Africa
- July 14, 2022
By Allard Duursma and guest contributors Julia Friedrich and Niklas Masuhr Since Russia launched its full-scale invasion of…
Ethnicity and Collective Targeting in Civil Wars
- April 13, 2015
Guest post by Lisa Hultman and Hanne Fjelde A few days ago UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon called on…
Sufis, Salafis, and the Religious Pacification of the African Sahel
- April 4, 2017
By Michael Kalin for Denver Dialogues. After gaining control over vast swathes of territory around Lake Chad and…
Friday Puzzler: Why No Violence In Kenya?
- March 15, 2013
By Barbara F. Walter Last week a couple of my colleagues left with some trepidation for Kenya to monitor…