Last week we asked why Kenya’s recent general election was peaceful, in contrast to the post-election violence that followed the country’s divisive December 2007 vote. At first glance this peaceful nature is puzzling: the election was close, like in 2007, and observers were concerned that violence would once again ensue. So why did little violence occur? Commenter hearabout suggests that in the years following the traumatic 2007-8 unrest Kenyans have worked to prevent tribal and political violence, and election media coverage has been comparatively milder. “Further,” hearabout writes, “the main actors of the 2008 violence, Kenyatta and Ruto and such, have also demonstrated restraint and called for peace.”
You May Also Like
Guns vs. Butter: Insurgent Service Provision in the Lake Chad Basin
- August 1, 2018
Guest post by Gray Barrett and Patrick Pierson. As the influence of ISIS wanes in the Middle East,…
The Politics of Inclusion in the DRC
- September 30, 2016
Guest post by Jay Benson. Recent weeks have seen an outburst of protests in the Democratic Republic of…
Why Egypt’s Presidential Elections are Neither Democratic nor Contentious
- March 14, 2018
By Dawn Brancati and Shimaa Hatab. On March 26-28, Egypt will hold its third presidential elections since the…
Understanding Coup Risk in Guinea-Bissau
- March 25, 2019
Guest post by Jonathan Powell and Clayton Besaw. In a region whose news is often dominated by reports…
Disarmament, Demobilization, and Reintegration in Ethiopia: What to Expect
- January 31, 2023
Guest post by Júlia Palik In November 2022, the government of Ethiopia and the Tigray People’s Liberation Front…
The Global Impacts of COVID-19
- July 13, 2020
How has the COVID-19 pandemic affected prospects for peace or conflict; political participation; and civil liberties around the…