Last week we asked why Kenya’s recent general election was peaceful, in contrast to the post-election violence that followed the country’s divisive December 2007 vote. At first glance this peaceful nature is puzzling: the election was close, like in 2007, and observers were concerned that violence would once again ensue. So why did little violence occur? Commenter hearabout suggests that in the years following the traumatic 2007-8 unrest Kenyans have worked to prevent tribal and political violence, and election media coverage has been comparatively milder. “Further,” hearabout writes, “the main actors of the 2008 violence, Kenyatta and Ruto and such, have also demonstrated restraint and called for peace.”
You May Also Like
Theresa May’s Brexit Debacle
- December 11, 2018
By Martin Rhodes for Denver Dialogues. On Monday December 10th, British Prime Minister Theresa May delayed a parliamentary…
Does Democracy Constrain Rulers or Pacify Dissidents?
- July 21, 2015
By Cullen Hendrix for Denver Dialogues After two decades of slow but consistent progress toward more democratic governance,…
Why Do Some People Participate in Democracy, While Others Don’t?
- October 4, 2022
Lindsay Morgan interviews Cesi Cruz and Christopher Ojeda Democracy depends on the participation of its citizens. But many…
A New Nicaraguan Revolution? Understanding This Week’s Popular Protests
- May 3, 2018
Guest post by Eric Mosinger and Kai Thaler. Over the past two weeks, Nicaragua’s streets have exploded in…
Ethnicity and Collective Targeting in Civil Wars
- April 13, 2015
Guest post by Lisa Hultman and Hanne Fjelde A few days ago UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon called on…
Russia’s Growing Influence in Africa
- July 14, 2022
By Allard Duursma and guest contributors Julia Friedrich and Niklas Masuhr Since Russia launched its full-scale invasion of…