Last week we asked why Kenya’s recent general election was peaceful, in contrast to the post-election violence that followed the country’s divisive December 2007 vote. At first glance this peaceful nature is puzzling: the election was close, like in 2007, and observers were concerned that violence would once again ensue. So why did little violence occur? Commenter hearabout suggests that in the years following the traumatic 2007-8 unrest Kenyans have worked to prevent tribal and political violence, and election media coverage has been comparatively milder. “Further,” hearabout writes, “the main actors of the 2008 violence, Kenyatta and Ruto and such, have also demonstrated restraint and called for peace.”
You May Also Like
The Promise and Perils of Postwar Cities
- January 24, 2020
Guest post by Kristine Höglund, Emma Elfversson, and Ivan Gusic More than half of the global population lives…
When Are Coups Fake News?
- June 16, 2020
By guest contributor John Chin Despite the havoc that the coronavirus pandemic continues to wreak around the world,…
The (Non)Democratic Effects of COVID-19. Which Regimes Will Recover?
- April 16, 2020
Guest post by Roman-Gabriel Olar The COVID-19 pandemic is not only a threat to public health, but also…
Grading Joe Biden on Foreign Policy
- March 17, 2020
By Danielle Lupton, and guest contributor Michael Robinson Former Vice President Joe Biden has rapidly emerged as the…
Pandemics and Democracy
- December 8, 2022
Lindsay Morgan interviews George Rutherford and Kim Yi Dionne Though COVID-19 failed to feature prominently in the US…
What’s Going on in Mali?
- September 10, 2012
By Erica Chenoweth This post is part of the “Would Someone Please Explain This to Me?” series. Reader JCB asks:…