Last week we asked why Kenya’s recent general election was peaceful, in contrast to the post-election violence that followed the country’s divisive December 2007 vote. At first glance this peaceful nature is puzzling: the election was close, like in 2007, and observers were concerned that violence would once again ensue. So why did little violence occur? Commenter hearabout suggests that in the years following the traumatic 2007-8 unrest Kenyans have worked to prevent tribal and political violence, and election media coverage has been comparatively milder. “Further,” hearabout writes, “the main actors of the 2008 violence, Kenyatta and Ruto and such, have also demonstrated restraint and called for peace.”
You May Also Like
The Politics of Migration
- November 23, 2022
Lindsay Morgan interviews Maggie Peters In a new episode from our friends at Talking Policy, UC Los Angeles…
What Happened in Bolivia is a Postmodern Coup. Here’s Why.
- November 19, 2019
Guest post by Abdullah Aydogan Bolivian President Evo Morales resigned a week ago after widespread street protests and…
Why It Matters if Trump Rejects the Election Result
- November 11, 2020
Guest post by Philip A. Martin As of this writing, President Donald Trump appears determined to deny that…
Barking Up the Wrong Tree: Donald Trump’s Failed Attempt at Using Culpability Against Hillary Clinton
- October 31, 2016
By Sarah E. Croco and Jessica L.P. Weeks. Donald Trump’s presidential campaign has been anything but ordinary. Amidst…
Does Democracy Constrain Rulers or Pacify Dissidents?
- July 21, 2015
By Cullen Hendrix for Denver Dialogues After two decades of slow but consistent progress toward more democratic governance,…
Internet Shutdowns During Political Unrest Are Becoming Normal – And It Should Worry Us
- September 16, 2016
Guest post by Anita Gohdes. Last night, for the eleventh night in a row, Internet access was shut…