Last week we asked why Kenya’s recent general election was peaceful, in contrast to the post-election violence that followed the country’s divisive December 2007 vote. At first glance this peaceful nature is puzzling: the election was close, like in 2007, and observers were concerned that violence would once again ensue. So why did little violence occur? Commenter hearabout suggests that in the years following the traumatic 2007-8 unrest Kenyans have worked to prevent tribal and political violence, and election media coverage has been comparatively milder. “Further,” hearabout writes, “the main actors of the 2008 violence, Kenyatta and Ruto and such, have also demonstrated restraint and called for peace.”
You May Also Like
Pandemics and Democracy
- December 8, 2022
Lindsay Morgan interviews George Rutherford and Kim Yi Dionne Though COVID-19 failed to feature prominently in the US…
On Local Backlash to Foreign Human Rights Pressure
- August 4, 2014
By Sarah Bush This spring, Ugandan President Yoweri Museveni signed into law a bill that criminalizes homosexuality. At…
Prospects for Peace in South Sudan
- July 31, 2017
By Patrick Pierson. Late last week, US Deputy Ambassador Michele Sison stood before the UN Security Council and…
Not Free or Credible: Why Regional Election Observers Failed Chad and Benin
- April 22, 2021
IGCC Dissertation Fellow Series Guest post by Christina Cottiero Welcoming election observation missions has become routine for governments…
Anarchy is Scary: New Evidence from Somalia
- October 3, 2018
Guest post by Jesse Driscoll. “Look, in Somalia, the cell phone system works…and it’s the only thing, maybe,…
Democracy in Crisis: Do Americans Support Deploying Election Monitors?
- November 3, 2020
Guest post by Travis Curtice and Charles Crabtree Today is election day in the United States. As polls…