Last week we asked why Kenya’s recent general election was peaceful, in contrast to the post-election violence that followed the country’s divisive December 2007 vote. At first glance this peaceful nature is puzzling: the election was close, like in 2007, and observers were concerned that violence would once again ensue. So why did little violence occur? Commenter hearabout suggests that in the years following the traumatic 2007-8 unrest Kenyans have worked to prevent tribal and political violence, and election media coverage has been comparatively milder. “Further,” hearabout writes, “the main actors of the 2008 violence, Kenyatta and Ruto and such, have also demonstrated restraint and called for peace.”
You May Also Like
Prospects for Peace in South Sudan
- July 31, 2017
By Patrick Pierson. Late last week, US Deputy Ambassador Michele Sison stood before the UN Security Council and…
Could a Coup d’Etat Happen in the United States in 2020?
- November 13, 2020
Election Day has come and passed, and Joe Biden is the clear winner. Since then, President Donald Trump…
Why Egypt’s Presidential Elections are Neither Democratic nor Contentious
- March 14, 2018
By Dawn Brancati and Shimaa Hatab. On March 26-28, Egypt will hold its third presidential elections since the…
Atop the Sovereignty Bubble
- August 14, 2012
By Bridget Coggins, Tanisha Fazal, and Ryan Griffiths Earlier this week, Sudan and South Sudan announced an agreement on oil pipeline fees…
Democracy in Crisis: Do Americans Support Deploying Election Monitors?
- November 3, 2020
Guest post by Travis Curtice and Charles Crabtree Today is election day in the United States. As polls…
Can Debt Relief Constrain Repressive Governments?
- October 25, 2022
Guest post by Brett L. Carter The African continent is confronting the prospect of a new debt crisis.…