Last week we asked why Kenya’s recent general election was peaceful, in contrast to the post-election violence that followed the country’s divisive December 2007 vote. At first glance this peaceful nature is puzzling: the election was close, like in 2007, and observers were concerned that violence would once again ensue. So why did little violence occur? Commenter hearabout suggests that in the years following the traumatic 2007-8 unrest Kenyans have worked to prevent tribal and political violence, and election media coverage has been comparatively milder. “Further,” hearabout writes, “the main actors of the 2008 violence, Kenyatta and Ruto and such, have also demonstrated restraint and called for peace.”
You May Also Like
When Zuma #Falls: Stress-Testing Democracy in South Africa
- August 1, 2017
By Timothy D. Sisk for Denver Dialogues. South Africa is witnessing an escalating crisis as the succession of…
That’s Not Really A Thing Anymore: Why Calls for Secession Come and Go
- February 7, 2023
Guest post by Kevin Gatter On the night of October 30, 1995, Canadians held their collective breath as…
Assessing the Risk of Electoral Violence in the United States
- October 13, 2020
Guest post by Austin C. Doctor and Stephen Bagwell Concern is growing that the coming US election season…
Modeling Piracy: A Bridge Between the Academic and Policy Communities
- March 1, 2016
By Andrew Scott for Denver Dialogues This January, the Sié Chéou-Kang Center for International Security and Diplomacy hosted…
The Electoral Origins of the Santomean Coup Attempt
- December 5, 2022
Guest post by Jonathan Powell and Julia Oldershaw Holding competitive elections and the transition of power following elections…
Violence Escalating in Eastern Congo
- November 21, 2012
By David E. Cunningham Things are heating up in eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC). On Tuesday,…