Last week we asked why Kenya’s recent general election was peaceful, in contrast to the post-election violence that followed the country’s divisive December 2007 vote. At first glance this peaceful nature is puzzling: the election was close, like in 2007, and observers were concerned that violence would once again ensue. So why did little violence occur? Commenter hearabout suggests that in the years following the traumatic 2007-8 unrest Kenyans have worked to prevent tribal and political violence, and election media coverage has been comparatively milder. “Further,” hearabout writes, “the main actors of the 2008 violence, Kenyatta and Ruto and such, have also demonstrated restraint and called for peace.”
You May Also Like
Why Do Some People Participate in Democracy, While Others Don’t?
- October 4, 2022
Lindsay Morgan interviews Cesi Cruz and Christopher Ojeda Democracy depends on the participation of its citizens. But many…
The World’s Newest War in the World’s Newest State
- January 6, 2014
By Tanisha Fazal The ongoing conflict in South Sudan has quickly escalated into civil war. With President Salva…
What We Talk About When We Talk About Status: The Economic Anxiety vs. Status Loss Debate
- June 5, 2018
By Cullen S. Hendrix for Denver Dialogues. In explaining the election of Donald Trump, two central narratives have…
Civil Society to the Rescue?
- September 10, 2020
By Evan Perkoski and Erica Chenoweth Widespread pro-democracy protests have engulfed Belarus over claims that the recent presidential…
Authoritarian Resilience: Why Bouteflika and Bashir Fell, but Ortega Remains
- April 30, 2019
By Kai Thaler for Denver Dialogues. April saw protestors—with an assist from the military—oust longtime authoritarian leaders Abdelaziz…
The US Elected a Record Number of Women: Now they May Face Violence
- November 28, 2018
By Juliana Restrepo Sanín for Denver Dialogues. The recent US mid-term elections saw a rise in the number…