Last week we asked why Kenya’s recent general election was peaceful, in contrast to the post-election violence that followed the country’s divisive December 2007 vote. At first glance this peaceful nature is puzzling: the election was close, like in 2007, and observers were concerned that violence would once again ensue. So why did little violence occur? Commenter hearabout suggests that in the years following the traumatic 2007-8 unrest Kenyans have worked to prevent tribal and political violence, and election media coverage has been comparatively milder. “Further,” hearabout writes, “the main actors of the 2008 violence, Kenyatta and Ruto and such, have also demonstrated restraint and called for peace.”
You May Also Like
The Dilemma of Extradition, Then and Now
- August 10, 2018
Guest post by Alexander P. Noonan. In recent weeks, much has been made of President Trump’s reluctance to…
Between Authoritarianism and Democracy
- July 31, 2018
By Alexander Beresford, Marie E. Berry, and Laura Mann for Denver Dialogues. For decades, political scientists have debated…
What’s Going On in Zambia?
- August 17, 2016
By Dawn Brancati. By less than 3 percent of the vote, President Edgar Lungu of the Patriotic Front…
Democracy in Peril: Ten Elections to Watch in 2018
- January 11, 2018
By Timothy D. Sisk for Denver Dialogues Democracy’s resilience into the 21st century is rightly questioned. In 2017,…
The Strategic Incentives for Violent Extremism
- February 3, 2015
By Barbara F. Walter On February 18th, the Obama administration will hold a Summit on Countering Violent Extremism.…
Hate Crimes In The USA
- July 18, 2012
By Will H. Moore Through the first six months of 2012 the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) has…