Last week we asked why Kenya’s recent general election was peaceful, in contrast to the post-election violence that followed the country’s divisive December 2007 vote. At first glance this peaceful nature is puzzling: the election was close, like in 2007, and observers were concerned that violence would once again ensue. So why did little violence occur? Commenter hearabout suggests that in the years following the traumatic 2007-8 unrest Kenyans have worked to prevent tribal and political violence, and election media coverage has been comparatively milder. “Further,” hearabout writes, “the main actors of the 2008 violence, Kenyatta and Ruto and such, have also demonstrated restraint and called for peace.”
You May Also Like
Why Kidnap Girls?
- May 7, 2014
By Barbara F. Walter One of the strategies that Boko Haram has pursued in its attempt to overthrow the…
Countering Online Foreign Influence in 2020 Elections
- January 23, 2020
Guest post by Jacob Shapiro and Kristen DeCaires Social media has proved an essential tool for catalyzing political…
Assessing the Risk of Electoral Violence in the United States
- October 13, 2020
Guest post by Austin C. Doctor and Stephen Bagwell Concern is growing that the coming US election season…
The Politics of Migration
- November 23, 2022
Lindsay Morgan interviews Maggie Peters In a new episode from our friends at Talking Policy, UC Los Angeles…
Can Debt Relief Constrain Repressive Governments?
- October 25, 2022
Guest post by Brett L. Carter The African continent is confronting the prospect of a new debt crisis.…
The Global Impacts of COVID-19
- July 13, 2020
How has the COVID-19 pandemic affected prospects for peace or conflict; political participation; and civil liberties around the…