Last week we asked why Kenya’s recent general election was peaceful, in contrast to the post-election violence that followed the country’s divisive December 2007 vote. At first glance this peaceful nature is puzzling: the election was close, like in 2007, and observers were concerned that violence would once again ensue. So why did little violence occur? Commenter hearabout suggests that in the years following the traumatic 2007-8 unrest Kenyans have worked to prevent tribal and political violence, and election media coverage has been comparatively milder. “Further,” hearabout writes, “the main actors of the 2008 violence, Kenyatta and Ruto and such, have also demonstrated restraint and called for peace.”
You May Also Like
Assessing the Risk of Electoral Violence in the United States
- October 13, 2020
Guest post by Austin C. Doctor and Stephen Bagwell Concern is growing that the coming US election season…
The Promise and Perils of Postwar Cities
- January 24, 2020
Guest post by Kristine Höglund, Emma Elfversson, and Ivan Gusic More than half of the global population lives…
Comparative Xenophobia, Part I
- May 16, 2013
By Steve Saideman Yesterday, the Washington Post put up this map based on World Values data and other…
Is Violent Democracy the New Norm? The View from Ghana
- January 13, 2020
Guest post by Patrick Pierson This November, Ghanaians go to the polls for a third consecutive showdown between…
The Attack on the Capitol Was a Success. So What Happens Next?
- January 12, 2021
By Evan Perkoski For the first time since 1814, unauthorized forces took control of the United States Capitol…
Is the US Headed Toward Civil War?
- January 6, 2022
This interview was originally published by the UC Institute on Global Conflict and Cooperation. On the anniversary of…