Last week we asked why Kenya’s recent general election was peaceful, in contrast to the post-election violence that followed the country’s divisive December 2007 vote. At first glance this peaceful nature is puzzling: the election was close, like in 2007, and observers were concerned that violence would once again ensue. So why did little violence occur? Commenter hearabout suggests that in the years following the traumatic 2007-8 unrest Kenyans have worked to prevent tribal and political violence, and election media coverage has been comparatively milder. “Further,” hearabout writes, “the main actors of the 2008 violence, Kenyatta and Ruto and such, have also demonstrated restraint and called for peace.”
You May Also Like
Conflict Minerals Legislation: Shooting at the Wrong Target… Again
- January 14, 2021
Guest post by Nik Stoop and Marijke Verpoorten On January 1, 2021, the European Conflict Minerals Act came…
Understanding Coup Risk in Guinea-Bissau
- March 25, 2019
Guest post by Jonathan Powell and Clayton Besaw. In a region whose news is often dominated by reports…
Who Counts in Conflicts During the Pandemic?
- January 5, 2021
Guest post by Sophia Dawkins When the WHO declared a pandemic last March, UN Secretary-General António Guterres appealed…
Understanding Trends in Electoral Violence: Lessons from South Africa
- April 25, 2019
Guest post by Patrick Pierson. The African continent will see two dozen elections in 2019. While many observers…
Can the Rise of Far-Right Parties Spark Extremist Violence?
- November 22, 2022
Guest post by Erika Ricci On September 25, Italy witnessed the victory of Giorgia Meloni’s Fratelli d’Italia party,…
What Electoral Reform Means for Iraq
- January 14, 2020
Guest post by Ariel I. Ahram The dramatic escalation of US-Iranian tensions affects no country more than Iraq.…