Last week we asked why Kenya’s recent general election was peaceful, in contrast to the post-election violence that followed the country’s divisive December 2007 vote. At first glance this peaceful nature is puzzling: the election was close, like in 2007, and observers were concerned that violence would once again ensue. So why did little violence occur? Commenter hearabout suggests that in the years following the traumatic 2007-8 unrest Kenyans have worked to prevent tribal and political violence, and election media coverage has been comparatively milder. “Further,” hearabout writes, “the main actors of the 2008 violence, Kenyatta and Ruto and such, have also demonstrated restraint and called for peace.”
You May Also Like
The Strategic Incentives for Violent Extremism
- February 3, 2015
By Barbara F. Walter On February 18th, the Obama administration will hold a Summit on Countering Violent Extremism.…
Conflict Minerals Legislation: Shooting at the Wrong Target… Again
- January 14, 2021
Guest post by Nik Stoop and Marijke Verpoorten On January 1, 2021, the European Conflict Minerals Act came…
Polarization, Populism, and PR: Proportional, Inclusive Elections Appear to be the Key to Countering Social Polarization
- September 14, 2018
By Timothy D. Sisk for Denver Dialogues. The just-concluded elections in Sweden reveal that the vein of populism…
Can the Rise of Far-Right Parties Spark Extremist Violence?
- November 22, 2022
Guest post by Erika Ricci On September 25, Italy witnessed the victory of Giorgia Meloni’s Fratelli d’Italia party,…
Wakanda, Afrofuturism, and Decolonizing International Relations Scholarship
- February 6, 2018
By Yolande Bouka for Denver Dialogues Next week, Marvel Studios will release one of its most anticipated films…
Looking Back on 2014
- December 30, 2014
By Danny Hirschel-Burns It’s been another great year for Political Violence @ a Glance. We won the International…