Last week we asked why Kenya’s recent general election was peaceful, in contrast to the post-election violence that followed the country’s divisive December 2007 vote. At first glance this peaceful nature is puzzling: the election was close, like in 2007, and observers were concerned that violence would once again ensue. So why did little violence occur? Commenter hearabout suggests that in the years following the traumatic 2007-8 unrest Kenyans have worked to prevent tribal and political violence, and election media coverage has been comparatively milder. “Further,” hearabout writes, “the main actors of the 2008 violence, Kenyatta and Ruto and such, have also demonstrated restraint and called for peace.”
You May Also Like
Why the Decolonizing Education Movement Matters for Peacebuilding and Democracy: Lessons from Bosnia and Herzegovina
- August 14, 2018
By Maja Halilovic-Pastuovic for Denver Dialogues. It has been three and a half years since the ‘decolonizing education’ movement began.…
Children and Armed Conflict: The Indirect Toll
- June 14, 2012
By Roland Paris On Monday, the United Nations released its annual report on children in armed conflict. Grisly…
Wakanda, Afrofuturism, and Decolonizing International Relations Scholarship
- February 6, 2018
By Yolande Bouka for Denver Dialogues Next week, Marvel Studios will release one of its most anticipated films…
Why Such Sparse Coverage of Africa’s Wars?
- December 20, 2013
By Barbara F. Walter Over the past two+ years, the war in Syria has dominated policy debates and newspaper…
Comparative Xenophobia, Part II
- May 22, 2013
By Steve Saideman I had intended to address the relationship between economic freedom and tolerance Max Fisher touched…
Electoral Violence in Sub-Saharan Africa and Its Economic Consequences
- April 22, 2020
By guest contributors Austin Doctor and Stephen Bagwell The weeks leading up to Cameroon’s February 2020 parliamentary and…