Last week we asked why Kenya’s recent general election was peaceful, in contrast to the post-election violence that followed the country’s divisive December 2007 vote. At first glance this peaceful nature is puzzling: the election was close, like in 2007, and observers were concerned that violence would once again ensue. So why did little violence occur? Commenter hearabout suggests that in the years following the traumatic 2007-8 unrest Kenyans have worked to prevent tribal and political violence, and election media coverage has been comparatively milder. “Further,” hearabout writes, “the main actors of the 2008 violence, Kenyatta and Ruto and such, have also demonstrated restraint and called for peace.”
You May Also Like
Diversions: The Decline of Freedom (2013)
- March 27, 2020
A new weekly PV@G series features one piece from our archive every Friday, chosen for its continued relevance,…
Resisting Democratic Erosion in Latin America and Beyond
- January 15, 2019
By Kai Thaler. The dawn of 2019 saw Latin America’s democratic crisis continue and deepen. Most prominently, New…
Looking Back on 2014
- December 30, 2014
By Danny Hirschel-Burns It’s been another great year for Political Violence @ a Glance. We won the International…
Another French Military Intervention in Africa
- January 21, 2013
By David E. Cunningham For the last several days, French forces have used military force to support the…
Prospects for Peace in South Sudan
- July 31, 2017
By Patrick Pierson. Late last week, US Deputy Ambassador Michele Sison stood before the UN Security Council and…
Not Just Victims and Perpetrators: Understanding Rwanda’s Genocide, Twenty Years-On
- April 9, 2014
Guest post by Aliza Luft One day about twenty years ago, a Hutu soldier in Rwanda accepted twenty-five dollars…