Last week we asked why Kenya’s recent general election was peaceful, in contrast to the post-election violence that followed the country’s divisive December 2007 vote. At first glance this peaceful nature is puzzling: the election was close, like in 2007, and observers were concerned that violence would once again ensue. So why did little violence occur? Commenter hearabout suggests that in the years following the traumatic 2007-8 unrest Kenyans have worked to prevent tribal and political violence, and election media coverage has been comparatively milder. “Further,” hearabout writes, “the main actors of the 2008 violence, Kenyatta and Ruto and such, have also demonstrated restraint and called for peace.”
You May Also Like
The World’s Newest War in the World’s Newest State
- January 6, 2014
By Tanisha Fazal The ongoing conflict in South Sudan has quickly escalated into civil war. With President Salva…
In Memoriam: Nelson Mandela
- December 6, 2013
By Barbara F. Walter In the early 1990s, I took a class at the University of Chicago where we…
Democracy in Peril: Ten Elections to Watch in 2018
- January 11, 2018
By Timothy D. Sisk for Denver Dialogues Democracy’s resilience into the 21st century is rightly questioned. In 2017,…
Disarmament, Demobilization, and Reintegration in Ethiopia: What to Expect
- January 31, 2023
Guest post by Júlia Palik In November 2022, the government of Ethiopia and the Tigray People’s Liberation Front…
Electoral Violence in Sub-Saharan Africa and Its Economic Consequences
- April 22, 2020
By guest contributors Austin Doctor and Stephen Bagwell The weeks leading up to Cameroon’s February 2020 parliamentary and…
Rwanda, Remembrance and Research: Or, How Rwandan Violence Taught Me to Embrace Subnational/Disaggregated Conflict Studies and Integral Conflict Research
- April 10, 2014
By Christian Davenport Fourteen years ago I began a journey to understand the political violence that took place in…