Last week we asked why Kenya’s recent general election was peaceful, in contrast to the post-election violence that followed the country’s divisive December 2007 vote. At first glance this peaceful nature is puzzling: the election was close, like in 2007, and observers were concerned that violence would once again ensue. So why did little violence occur? Commenter hearabout suggests that in the years following the traumatic 2007-8 unrest Kenyans have worked to prevent tribal and political violence, and election media coverage has been comparatively milder. “Further,” hearabout writes, “the main actors of the 2008 violence, Kenyatta and Ruto and such, have also demonstrated restraint and called for peace.”
You May Also Like
Ethnicity and Collective Targeting in Civil Wars
- April 13, 2015
Guest post by Lisa Hultman and Hanne Fjelde A few days ago UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon called on…
The Threat in America is Destroying Democracy from Within
- September 28, 2020
By Stephen M. Saideman Because of Donald Trump’s statements, and news that his campaign staff has been seeking…
The Promise and Perils of Postwar Cities
- January 24, 2020
Guest post by Kristine Höglund, Emma Elfversson, and Ivan Gusic More than half of the global population lives…
Resisting Democratic Erosion in Latin America and Beyond
- January 15, 2019
By Kai Thaler. The dawn of 2019 saw Latin America’s democratic crisis continue and deepen. Most prominently, New…
Breakaway Youth in Lebanon? (Think Twice)
- December 12, 2019
Guest post by Michael Hoffman Since October 17, Lebanon has witnessed sustained large-scale demonstrations against its ruling elite,…
Another French Military Intervention in Africa
- January 21, 2013
By David E. Cunningham For the last several days, French forces have used military force to support the…