Last week we asked why Kenya’s recent general election was peaceful, in contrast to the post-election violence that followed the country’s divisive December 2007 vote. At first glance this peaceful nature is puzzling: the election was close, like in 2007, and observers were concerned that violence would once again ensue. So why did little violence occur? Commenter hearabout suggests that in the years following the traumatic 2007-8 unrest Kenyans have worked to prevent tribal and political violence, and election media coverage has been comparatively milder. “Further,” hearabout writes, “the main actors of the 2008 violence, Kenyatta and Ruto and such, have also demonstrated restraint and called for peace.”
You May Also Like
Could A Coup d’Etat Happen in the United States in 2020?
- June 2, 2020
Guest post by John Chin, Joseph Wright, and David Carter As frustration mounts over President Donald Trump’s response to…
Repression, Regime Consolidation, and Latin America’s Authoritarian (Re)Turn
- September 25, 2018
By Kai Thaler for Denver Dialogues. This week, Nicaraguan President Daniel Ortega is planning to attend the United…
That’s Not Really A Thing Anymore: Why Calls for Secession Come and Go
- February 7, 2023
Guest post by Kevin Gatter On the night of October 30, 1995, Canadians held their collective breath as…
Will Poll Watchers Make the US Elections Violent?
- October 12, 2020
By Dawn Brancati President Trump has pledged to mobilize tens of thousands of poll watchers to observe the…
Will the US Experience Election Violence? Lessons from Kenya
- October 29, 2020
Guest post by Kathleen Klaus Kenya experienced one of the worst episodes of election violence in 2007 when…
Why Bother to Vote in Fraudulent Elections?
- April 18, 2014
By Barbara F. Walter Last week I posed a puzzle that asked two questions: First, why would voter turnout…