Last week we asked why Kenya’s recent general election was peaceful, in contrast to the post-election violence that followed the country’s divisive December 2007 vote. At first glance this peaceful nature is puzzling: the election was close, like in 2007, and observers were concerned that violence would once again ensue. So why did little violence occur? Commenter hearabout suggests that in the years following the traumatic 2007-8 unrest Kenyans have worked to prevent tribal and political violence, and election media coverage has been comparatively milder. “Further,” hearabout writes, “the main actors of the 2008 violence, Kenyatta and Ruto and such, have also demonstrated restraint and called for peace.”
You May Also Like
Political Influence Through Social Media is Growing, But Slowly
- September 23, 2020
Guest post by Jacob N. Shapiro, Diego Martin, and Julia Ilhardt Last week, FBI Director Christopher Wray testified…
Diversions: The Decline of Freedom (2013)
- March 27, 2020
A new weekly PV@G series features one piece from our archive every Friday, chosen for its continued relevance,…
Civil Society to the Rescue?
- September 10, 2020
By Evan Perkoski and Erica Chenoweth Widespread pro-democracy protests have engulfed Belarus over claims that the recent presidential…
Barking Up the Wrong Tree: Donald Trump’s Failed Attempt at Using Culpability Against Hillary Clinton
- October 31, 2016
By Sarah E. Croco and Jessica L.P. Weeks. Donald Trump’s presidential campaign has been anything but ordinary. Amidst…
What We Know about Militant Groups as Political Parties
- December 4, 2017
By Aila Matanock Featured on both wanted posters and campaign posters in Pakistan, Hafiz Muhammad Saeed is not…
How the Trump Campaign is Undermining American Democracy
- November 4, 2016
Guest post by Allison Patch and Anne Frugé. The 2016 election provides a reality-check about the frailty of…