Last week we asked why Kenya’s recent general election was peaceful, in contrast to the post-election violence that followed the country’s divisive December 2007 vote. At first glance this peaceful nature is puzzling: the election was close, like in 2007, and observers were concerned that violence would once again ensue. So why did little violence occur? Commenter hearabout suggests that in the years following the traumatic 2007-8 unrest Kenyans have worked to prevent tribal and political violence, and election media coverage has been comparatively milder. “Further,” hearabout writes, “the main actors of the 2008 violence, Kenyatta and Ruto and such, have also demonstrated restraint and called for peace.”
You May Also Like
Democracy in Crisis: Do Americans Support Deploying Election Monitors?
- November 3, 2020
Guest post by Travis Curtice and Charles Crabtree Today is election day in the United States. As polls…
Why Jihadists Are Collecting “Zakat” in the Sahel
- July 12, 2021
Guest post by Alex Thurston Around the world, jihadists use a dizzying array of mechanisms to finance themselves,…
Are Military Coups Back in Style in Africa?
- December 1, 2021
Guest post by Sean M. Zeigler The seizure of power in October by the Sudanese military, and the…
If Repression Is Local, So Are the Solutions
- January 20, 2022
By Emily Hencken Ritter and Sequential Potential Dr. Martin Luther King spent his adult life fighting without violence…
Rising Violence and the Risks to Children in Burkina Faso
- August 11, 2021
Guest post by Christopher M. Faulkner and Jared Thompson In June, Islamist militants launched an attack against the…
Nobody Wins with Violence Around Elections
- October 26, 2020
Guest post by Pearce Edwards and Patrick Pierson. With less than two weeks to go until Election Day…