Last week we asked why Kenya’s recent general election was peaceful, in contrast to the post-election violence that followed the country’s divisive December 2007 vote. At first glance this peaceful nature is puzzling: the election was close, like in 2007, and observers were concerned that violence would once again ensue. So why did little violence occur? Commenter hearabout suggests that in the years following the traumatic 2007-8 unrest Kenyans have worked to prevent tribal and political violence, and election media coverage has been comparatively milder. “Further,” hearabout writes, “the main actors of the 2008 violence, Kenyatta and Ruto and such, have also demonstrated restraint and called for peace.”
You May Also Like
How the Trump Campaign is Undermining American Democracy
- November 4, 2016
Guest post by Allison Patch and Anne Frugé. The 2016 election provides a reality-check about the frailty of…
The African Leader Summit Should Be About American as Well as African Political Violence
- December 13, 2022
By Christian Davenport Every now and then a group of political leaders gets together in an effort to…
Resisting Democratic Erosion in Latin America and Beyond
- January 15, 2019
By Kai Thaler. The dawn of 2019 saw Latin America’s democratic crisis continue and deepen. Most prominently, New…
Our Greatest Hits (So Far)
- February 7, 2020
Political Violence At A Glance was created in 2008, to answers questions on the most pressing problems related…
Wakanda, Afrofuturism, and Decolonizing International Relations Scholarship
- February 6, 2018
By Yolande Bouka for Denver Dialogues Next week, Marvel Studios will release one of its most anticipated films…
Everyday Peacekeeping in the Central African Republic
- April 13, 2020
By Allard Duursma Imagine this: You are a farmer in northwest Central African Republic. In 2013, several of…