Last week we asked why Kenya’s recent general election was peaceful, in contrast to the post-election violence that followed the country’s divisive December 2007 vote. At first glance this peaceful nature is puzzling: the election was close, like in 2007, and observers were concerned that violence would once again ensue. So why did little violence occur? Commenter hearabout suggests that in the years following the traumatic 2007-8 unrest Kenyans have worked to prevent tribal and political violence, and election media coverage has been comparatively milder. “Further,” hearabout writes, “the main actors of the 2008 violence, Kenyatta and Ruto and such, have also demonstrated restraint and called for peace.”
You May Also Like
Minority Groups, Violence, and Voting Systems in Myanmar
- February 10, 2014
Guest post by Luke Sanford Myanmar has largely fallen off the international newsfeed despite Aung San Suu Kyi’s…
Is Zimbabwe Headed Towards Civil War?
- September 19, 2016
Guest post by Aaron Stanley. A number of recent reports out of Zimbabwe note a fracturing of Zimbabwe’s…
Why has Sudan’s Tolerance for Anti-Regime Protests Run Dry?
- June 18, 2019
By Dawn Brancati. In early June, Sudanese paramilitary forces fired live ammunition into an unarmed crowd of protesters…
Contention—and Its Alternatives—During and After the American Election
- October 30, 2020
It’s been an election season unlike any other. Voter turnout is so far at an all-time high, and…
Was the End of the Cold War the Beginning of the Oil Curse?
- January 16, 2018
By Cullen S. Hendrix for Denver Dialogues Oil is the world’s most widely-traded commodity, and–a few alternative fuel…
The Future of Conflict in Mining
- October 27, 2020
Guest post by Anouk Rigterink and Kristen DeCaires Gall On June 17, 2019, the Democratic Republic of Congo’s…