Last week we asked why Kenya’s recent general election was peaceful, in contrast to the post-election violence that followed the country’s divisive December 2007 vote. At first glance this peaceful nature is puzzling: the election was close, like in 2007, and observers were concerned that violence would once again ensue. So why did little violence occur? Commenter hearabout suggests that in the years following the traumatic 2007-8 unrest Kenyans have worked to prevent tribal and political violence, and election media coverage has been comparatively milder. “Further,” hearabout writes, “the main actors of the 2008 violence, Kenyatta and Ruto and such, have also demonstrated restraint and called for peace.”
You May Also Like
Authoritarian Resilience: Why Bouteflika and Bashir Fell, but Ortega Remains
- April 30, 2019
By Kai Thaler for Denver Dialogues. April saw protestors—with an assist from the military—oust longtime authoritarian leaders Abdelaziz…
Why Kidnap Girls?
- May 7, 2014
By Barbara F. Walter One of the strategies that Boko Haram has pursued in its attempt to overthrow the…
“Hugs, not gunshots”: How can AMLO convince Mexicans of a new approach to security?
- October 18, 2018
Guest post by Juan Masullo and Davide Morisi. The same night Mexico’s President-elect, Andrés Manuel López Obrador (aka…
Ethnicity and Collective Targeting in Civil Wars
- April 13, 2015
Guest post by Lisa Hultman and Hanne Fjelde A few days ago UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon called on…
Trump Gambles on American Racial Tension
- July 9, 2020
Guest post by Graig R. Klein, Carla Martínez Machain, and Efe Tokdemir Doubling down on a law and…
What to do When Women Politicians are Attacked? Here are Four Ideas from Around the World
- May 14, 2019
By Juliana Restrepo Sanín for Denver Dialogues. In a previous post, I discussed how women elected to public…