Last week we asked why Kenya’s recent general election was peaceful, in contrast to the post-election violence that followed the country’s divisive December 2007 vote. At first glance this peaceful nature is puzzling: the election was close, like in 2007, and observers were concerned that violence would once again ensue. So why did little violence occur? Commenter hearabout suggests that in the years following the traumatic 2007-8 unrest Kenyans have worked to prevent tribal and political violence, and election media coverage has been comparatively milder. “Further,” hearabout writes, “the main actors of the 2008 violence, Kenyatta and Ruto and such, have also demonstrated restraint and called for peace.”
You May Also Like
Authoritarian Resilience: Why Bouteflika and Bashir Fell, but Ortega Remains
- April 30, 2019
By Kai Thaler for Denver Dialogues. April saw protestors—with an assist from the military—oust longtime authoritarian leaders Abdelaziz…
Internet Shutdowns During Political Unrest Are Becoming Normal – And It Should Worry Us
- September 16, 2016
Guest post by Anita Gohdes. Last night, for the eleventh night in a row, Internet access was shut…
Contention—and Its Alternatives—During and After the American Election
- October 30, 2020
It’s been an election season unlike any other. Voter turnout is so far at an all-time high, and…
Assessing the Risk of Electoral Violence in the United States
- October 13, 2020
Guest post by Austin C. Doctor and Stephen Bagwell Concern is growing that the coming US election season…
The (Non)Democratic Effects of COVID-19. Which Regimes Will Recover?
- April 16, 2020
Guest post by Roman-Gabriel Olar The COVID-19 pandemic is not only a threat to public health, but also…
Countering Corruption: What to Do When Citizens Vote for Political Malfeasance
- July 31, 2019
Guest post by Patrick Pierson. It’s been a long couple of months in Durban, South Africa. On May…