Last week we asked why Kenya’s recent general election was peaceful, in contrast to the post-election violence that followed the country’s divisive December 2007 vote. At first glance this peaceful nature is puzzling: the election was close, like in 2007, and observers were concerned that violence would once again ensue. So why did little violence occur? Commenter hearabout suggests that in the years following the traumatic 2007-8 unrest Kenyans have worked to prevent tribal and political violence, and election media coverage has been comparatively milder. “Further,” hearabout writes, “the main actors of the 2008 violence, Kenyatta and Ruto and such, have also demonstrated restraint and called for peace.”
You May Also Like
Barking Up the Wrong Tree: Donald Trump’s Failed Attempt at Using Culpability Against Hillary Clinton
- October 31, 2016
By Sarah E. Croco and Jessica L.P. Weeks. Donald Trump’s presidential campaign has been anything but ordinary. Amidst…
Burundi Is On the Verge of a Mass Atrocity. Will We Ignore It Again?
- November 11, 2015
By Barbara F. Walter Rarely does the international community get the opportunity to correct an enormous mistake from…
Rule #1 for Secessionist Movements
- August 20, 2013
By Stephen Saideman If one is going to try to get votes in support of a separatist referendum, rule…
Déjà vu in Central Africa
- August 9, 2012
By David E. Cunningham For the last several weeks, M23, a new rebel group made up of former soldiers…
Burundi and the Challenges of Evaluating Peace-building Success
- May 22, 2015
Guest post by David E. Cunningham Recent events in Burundi, where President Pierre Nkurunziza’s decision to seek a…
Understanding Insurgent Violence in the Context of Elections
- April 16, 2018
Guest post by Jóhanna K. Birnir and Anita Gohdes. What defines the relationship between insurgent groups and their…